Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sources of Health care providers’ Self-efficacy to deliver Health Education: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Esterhuizen
27 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prisca Ac Zwanikken
18 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Esterhuizen
16 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars - Jerdén
24 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Dec 2018 Editorially accepted
9 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12909-018-1448-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement