Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean Likert Values for Post-Hackathon Survey Statements

From: Institutionalizing healthcare hackathons to promote diversity in collaboration in medicine

Statementa

Mean Likert Value (MLV)b

Medical (n = 24)

Engineering (n = 49)

Business (n = 23)

Design (n = 12)

Total (n = 111)

Educational Value

 I learned about human-centered design

4.25

4.37

3.25

4.44

4.12

 I learned about the prototyping process

4.28

4.40

3.30

4.22

4.14

 I learned about the components of a business model

4.24

3.89

3.45

3.82

3.88

 I learned about the process of entrepreneurship

4.25

3.91

3.35

3.70

3.86

 I learned about the healthcare regulatory landscape

3.33

3.84

3.48

4.50

3.71

 I learned about the barriers that prevent new innovations from reaching the healthcare market

4.12

4.10

3.77

4.82

4.12

 I learned about innovations that are at the forefront of today’s healthcare industry

4.38

4.40

4.27

4.73

4.40

 I gained a deeper understanding of the problems facing the healthcare industry

4.25

4.74

4.68

5.00

4.64

 After attending health++, I feel much more aware of the cultural context issues in the design of healthcare solutions

4.00

4.54

3.84

4.33

4.27

Professional Development

 The new professional connections I made were valuable

4.96

4.58

3.90

4.45

4.52

 For problem pitchers: communicating my need to the health++ audience was a valuable experience/opportunity

5.10

4.80

4.36

3.0

4.73

Event Structure

 Interacting with mentors was beneficial to our team

4.23

3.95

4.31

4.40

4.13

 The problem pitching session was valuable in identifying the problems I cared most about

4.62

4.76

4.05

4.36

4.55

 Our team was able to quickly identify a specific need or pain point to work on

4.33

4.23

3.55

4.18

4.12

 I would have made similar progress without the hackathon

1.19

1.49

1.39

2.00

1.47

 I feel that the weekend I spent tackling a validated need has accelerated the development of solutions to improve healthcare

4.57

4.30

3.15

4.22

4.12

 In comparison to other outlets and events, health++ is a unique opportunity to learn about healthcare innovation

5.38

5.22

4.85

4.90

5.15

 Our team was able to challenge existing paradigms, models, and products that are currently in the healthcare market

5.38

4.74

4.68

5.00

4.23

 I intend to continue working on my project and make substantial progress

4.43

3.91

2.67

3.09

3.71

Diversity in Collaboration

 It was valuable working with an interdisciplinary team of diverse backgrounds

5.60

5.38

4.95

5.18

5.33

 Our team was able to exchange knowledge and educate each other about our individual areas of expertise

5.38

4.74

4.68

5.00

4.91

 After attending health++, I feel more confident in my ability to work with multidisciplinary teams

5.21

4.88

4.35

4.55

4.82

Interest in Medical Innovation

 After attending health++, I feel more confident in my ability to contribute to solving healthcare challenges

4.83

4.78

4.18

4.08

4.59

 After attending health++, I feel more inspired to work on problems in healthcare innovation

5.08

4.82

4.59

4.83

4.83

 I would like to attend more healthcare hackathons like Health++

5.71

5.52

5.14

5.58

5.50

  1. aStatements were designed to gauge participant perception of the educational and professional development value of the healthcare hackathon. Statements also addressed the overall structure and quality of the event and its impact on participant perception of interdisciplinary collaboration and medical innovation
  2. bScores on the Likert scale ranged from 0 to 6 (0 = strongly disagree, 1 = disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = somewhat agree, 5 = agree, 6 = strongly agree)