Skip to main content

Table 2 FYMS (n = 24) checklist and global rating scores for clinical activities at the start (t1) and end (t2) of Internal Medicine rotation (mean, SD); p-values for paired t-tests / Wilcoxon signed rank tests; the category “Competent students” indicates the percentage of students whose performance was rated with level 3 or higher; Pearson’s Χ2

From: Ready to run the wards? – A descriptive follow-up study assessing future doctors’ clinical skills

Clinical Activity

Assessment

t1

M (SD)

t2

M (SD)

Sig.d

History taking

 

Checklist rating [%]

48 (8)

58 (09)

<.001

 

GCR c [1–6]

3.88 (.96)

4.50 (.38)

.004

 

Clinical competence [1–5]

2.43 (.71)

3.04 (.53)

.002

 

Competent students [%]

33

66

.004

Physical examination

 

Checklist rating [%]

55 (11)

59 (11)

.135

 

IPPIa rating [1–6]

4.03 (.54)

4.40 (.35)

.008

 

Clinical competence [1–5]

2.40 (.49)

2.96 (.51)

<.001

 

Competent students [%]

21

29

.505

Case presentation

 

Checklist rating [%]

39 (14)

46 (14)

.002

 

Handoff CEXb [1–9]

3.71 (.89)

4.82 (.81)

<.001

 

Clinical competence [1–5]

1.65 (.63)

2.19 (.66)

.001

 

Competent students [%]

8

29

.065

IV cannulation

 

Checklist rating [%]

81 (9)

83 (9)

.25

 

IPPIa rating [1–6]

4.34 (.65)

4.20 (.59)

.213

 

Clinical competence [1–5]

3.19 (.69)

3.60 (.85)

.03

 

Competent students [%]

80

87

.6

  1. aIntegrated Procedural Protocol Instrument
  2. bClinical Examination Exercise
  3. cGlobal communication rating
  4. dα = 0,05