Skip to main content

Table 1 Examples of data demonstrating low, moderate and good engagement

From: Development and initial validation of an online engagement metric using virtual patients

Page

Case A - Low

Case B - Moderate

Case C - Good

 

Time

MCQ

CR

Summary

Time

MCQ

CR

Summary

Time

MCQ

CR

Summary

1

7

   

11

   

393

100

  

2

10

   

13

0

  

193

 

1

 

3

27

   

17

   

317

71

11

 

4

10

   

14

43

  

281

 

2

 

5

14

   

43

   

604

43

1

 

6

4

   

26

0

  

147

100

  

7

73

0

  

28

   

873

   

8

23

  

0

10

   

124

0

2

 

9

19

27

  

14

0

  

110

100

  

10

4

   

9

20

  

122

 

1

 

11

18

   

11

   

41

   

12

11

   

6

   

85

   

13

10

   

8

   

136

67

1

 

14

12

   

6

0

  

95

   

15

6

   

21

   

56

100

  

16

28

60

  

7

0

2

 

168

   

17

8

0

  

22

   

58

75

  

18

3

   

10

0

  

121

 

1

1

19

11

20

  

79

   

197

   

20

9

33

  

17

   

294

14

  

21

4

   

56

43

  

407

   

22

14

0

  

8

  

1

223

100

  

23

7

100

  

5

0

  

768

   

24

9

   

15

   

46

   

25

4

   

15

   

522

   

26

1

       

23

   

27

9

       

8

   

28

        

609

   

Comp

0.15

0.3

0

0

0.28

0.10

0.17

1

0.96

0.7

1

1

Score

0.11

0.39

0.92

  1. Table 1 demonstrates examples of user interaction data and scoring from 3 different cases, each with a different level of engagement. Final engagement score < 0.3 = low; 0.3 to 0.5 = moderate; > 0.5 = good. Time is in seconds per page. MCQ = multiple choice question; data is shown only for pages that include an MCQ. CR = clinical reasoning; data is shown only for pages in which a student action occurred. Summary = summary statement; data is shown only for the page that included a summary statement question.
  2. Page = page number. Comp = component score. Score = final engagement score.