Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Multiple mini interviews: revealing similarities across institutions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Barbara Griffin
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacqui McLaughlin
6 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Ooms
14 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kent Hecker
21 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Barbara Griffin
Resubmission - Version 3
21 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacqui McLaughlin
23 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Ooms
16 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Barbara Griffin
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12909-018-1298-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement