Open Peer Review Reports for: The impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Jun 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Aug 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Greco |
| 7 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kim Blake |
| 10 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Teresa Pawlikowska |
| 11 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk |
| 16 Apr 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Rebecca Baines |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Apr 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Apr 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk |
| 16 May 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kim Blake |
| 23 May 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Teresa Pawlikowska |
| 8 Jun 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Rebecca Baines |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Jul 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Jul 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-018-1277-0 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
