Skip to main content

Table 5 Thematic analysis of measures perceived to be effective for tackling academic dishonesty based on respondents’ feedback

From: Academic dishonesty among academics in Malaysia: a comparison between healthcare and non-healthcare academics

Theme

Comments

Proper implementation/enforcement of rules and policy

“Code of ethics and standards are only written on handbook; however, the enforcement of the code of ethics and standard are (has) not materialized and (has) not (been) implemented” (NH, Lecturer)

“Having a policy cannot be used as a guarantee that lecturers will always uphold their integrity. It is only to what extent that the policy is been practiced that counts” (HC, Lecturer)

“There are rules and regulations but across the board, enforcement is an issue” (HC, Professor)

Thorough investigation and immediate action” (NH, Professor)

Protect the whistle blower; Reward the honesty such as being honest (sic).” (NH, Senior Lecturer)

Proper channels/procedures to report/investigate

More avenues for anonymous feedback from other academics and students on academic dishonesty” (NH, Senior Lecturer)

Peer review

Peer review system” (HC, Senior Lecturer)

Higher authority/management should lead by example

Good examples of academic integrity from senior lecturers can be the best guidance to all fresh lecturers.” (NH, Senior Lecturer)

The management team of the university must commit themselves towards academic integrity of the academic staff - take action when required” (NH, Senior Lecturer)

Rotation of leadership positions to prevent complacency

Rotate the headship to prevent complacency” (HC, Senior Lecture)

  1. Abbreviations: HC, healthcare academic, NH non-healthcare academics