Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the Research Evidence of Stakeholder Views of Selection to Medicine

From: A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission

Author /Year/ Type of article

Location / Setting

Study Design / Aim

Selection tool(s)

Stakeholder/ number / response rate(RR)

Data Collection method

Outcome variable relevant to this review

Overall findings relevant to this review

MERSQI Quality

Adams 2009 a [52] Research paper

USA

Medical Schools

Quantitative

Academic record (compared acceptability of different educational settings)

Medical school administrators N = 58, RR 49%

Postal questionnaire survey, with 3 hypothetical scenarios to rank, checkboxes and open questions.

Offer of interviews, based on applications that were identical except for the institution where the applicant received their academic qualification.

University academic record perceived as preferable to both community college courses and online courses by selector administrators, in deciding offers of interviews, citing concerns about quality and rigor.

7

Agrawal et al. 2005a [53] Research paper

USA

Medical Schools

Quantitative

Aptitude Test / MCAT/ Academic Record GPA / Other factors

Deans of Student Affairs

N = 86, RR 59%

Postal questionnaire, based on extensive literature review & piloted.

Percentage responses

MCAT (90%), GPA (60%), lack of financial aid (48%), lack of role model (77%) seen as barriers to under-represented and minority applicants by deans

8.5

Brown & Griffin 2012 a [54]

Abstract

Australia

1 medical school

Quantitative

Academic record/ UMAT or GAMSAT and interviews

Mixed stakeholder group- comprising applicants medical students patients and doctors. N = 938 RR = UTD

Questionnaire

Collated views of perceived validity, familiarity, overall confidence in selection

Confidence in selection methods low for all groups, even lower in medical professionals. Cognitive ability tests least valid/ interviews most valid by this mixed stakeholder group.

6

Brownell et al. 2007a [55] Research paper

Canada

1 Medical School

Quantitative

MMI

Applicants N = 277 RR 98.5%

Interviewers N = 74, RR 91%

Questionnaire

Mean ratings and standard deviations of 5 point Likert scale responses (1 = strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree)

MMIs acceptable to both. Applicants free from gender (4.7) & cultural bias (4.6), adequate time (3.6) stressful (2.9). Interviewers had adequate orientation (4.4) & preparation (4.6), scoring sheet allowed differentiation (4), adequate time (4.1) MMI fair (4.3).

8

Campagna-Vaillancourtet al 2013a [45] Research paper

Canada

Postgraduate residency programme – Ears, Nose Throat, Head & Neck

Embedded mixed methods

MMI

Applicants N = 45, RR 100%

Interviewers N = 18, RR 100%

Questionnaire survey with open ended qualitative comments

Mean ratings and standard deviations of 7 point Likert scale responses (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree)

MMIs acceptable to both. Applicants: MMI free from gender (6.2), cultural (6.2), age bias (6.3); adequate time (6.1), preferred to TI (5.3), Interviewers: better than TI (5.3) adequate preparation (5.2), scoring allowed differentiation (4.7), adequate time (5.4) MMI fair (6).

8.5

Christakis et al. 2010 [56]

Research paper

Canada

1 Postgraduate residency – ophthalmology

Quantitative

Interviews day

Applicants from two years (2000, 2005).

N = 26, RR 79%

Questionnaire – survey, with Likert scale responses & some overlap of questions between the two surveys.

Frequency of responses, from both years merged.

14/14 applicants felt the interview day was valuable, 14/14 appropriate length, 14/14 adequate opportunity to express own ideas and opinions. 20/26 felt the interview day affected their opinion of the programme positively and increased their likelihood of accepting a place.

7.5

Cleland et al. 2011a [46] Research paper

Scotland

5

Undergraduate Medical Schools

Mixed

Methods

Aptitude Test/ UKCAT

1st Yr Medical students

Qualitative strand N = 28

Quantitative strand N = 883, RR = 88%

Focus groups & Questionnaire survey (4 items relevant to this review)

Framework analysis & Percentage responses

Medical students viewed UKCAT poorly, lacking face validity, poor predictive validity, coachable, discriminatory against less affluent applicants. Only 20% agreed that UKCAT was useful.

9

Daram et al. 2014 [57] Research paper

USA

1 Medical Fellowship – Gastroenterology

Quantitative

Web based video conferencing interviews (WBVC)

Applicants

N = 16, RR = 100%

Questionnaire

Percentage responses

13 candidates (81%) felt WBVC interview met or exceeded expectations, 87% thought WBVC should be an option in fellowship interviews. 25% felt that WBVC was equivalent to or better than their traditional interview experience.

6

Dennehy et al. 2013a [58] Research paper

Ireland

Medical School Entry – Survey conducted in one geographical area

Quantitative

Aptitude Test- HPAT-Ireland/Academic record

General practitioners (GPs) N = 122, RR = 79%

27 item Questionnaire survey

Percentage responses

GPs supported the use of aptitude tests in principle (69.7%) & academic record (96.7%) but 30% unhappy with reforms introducing aptitude tests. Concerns expressed re socio-economic bias of academic record (71%) & HPAT-Ireland (66%)

7.5

Dhar et al. 2012a [59] Research paper

New Zealand

2 Undergraduate Medical Schools

Quantitative

Aptitude Test / UMAT

Medical students

N = 1325, RR 65%

35 Item Questionnaire survey- closed questions & 4 or 5 point Likert scales.

Binary logistic regression & percentage responses

56% of students thought UMAT was not important for selection, 67% was not fair, 81% stressful, 54% felt it assessed non cognitive attributes not really or not at all.

8

Dore et al. 2010a [60] Research paper

Canada

Post graduate programmes in Obstetrics, Paediatrics, Internal Medicine

Quantitative

MMI

Applicants- N = 484 RR = UTD

MMI Assessors – N = UTD, RR = UTD

Questionnaire survey

Percentage responses to satisfaction ratings

Applicants: 88% believed they could positively portray themselves & 70% felt they had adequate time. Assessors: 90% felt they had a reasonable portrayal of candidate’s abilities 74% felt MMI better than TI

7.5

Dowell et al. 2012 [61] Research paper

Scotland

1 Undergraduate Medical School

Quantitative

MMI

Applicants N = 324, RR 75%

Interviewers – N = 116, RR = 58%

Online Questionnaire

Percentage responses

94% applicants thought MMIs fair, 33% more stressful than TI, 74% preferred MMI to TI

90% of interviewers thought MMIs fair, 23% felt they needed more specific training

7.5

El Says et al. 2013 [62] Research paper

Saudi Arabia

1 Medical School

Quantitative

MMI

Applicants and interviewers

N=UTD, RR = UTD

UTD

UTD

MMI was acceptable to both students & faculty

3

Eva et al. 2004 [63] Research paper

Canada

1 Medical School

Quantitative

MMI (voluntary MMI did not actually contribute to selection)

Applicants N = 115 RR 98%

Assessors N = 40, RR = UTD

Questionnaire with Likert scale responses and free text comment boxes

Mean ratings and standard deviations of Likert scale responses between 1 (definitely not) to 7 (definitely).

Applicants & Assessors felt candidates were able to accurately portray themselves (5.64, 5.7) adequate advance instructions (5.87, 6.1) clear station instructions (5.84, 6.2) respectively. Free text: applicants wanted more time and interviewers wanted more training

7

Eva et al. 2004 [64] Research paper

Canada

1 medical School

Quantitative

MMI (voluntary MMI did not actually contribute to selection)

Applicants N = 54, RR UTD

Interviewers N = 36 RR = UTD

Questionnaire - 8 items Likert scale responses and free text comment boxes

Mean ratings and standard deviations on 7 point Likert scale (1 = definitely not, 7 = definitely)

Applicants and assessors felt that candidates could accurately portray themselves (5.26, 5.23), adequate advance instructions (5.84, 5.54) clear station instructions (5.86, 5.53) respectively. Applicants found the MMI difficult (4.05).

7

Eva & Macala 2014 [65] Research paper

Canada

1 medical School

Quantitative

MMIs-(voluntary MMI – comprising – free form stations, behaviour interview (BI) & SJT type interview

Applicants N = 41 RR = UTD

Interviewers N = 48 RR = UTD

Questionnaire - 5 items for applicants and similar version for interviewers

Mean ratings, standard deviations on 7 point Likert scale (1 = definitely not, 7 = definitely, or modified slightly to match the question)

Applicants: Free form stations more anxiety (p < 0.05), difficult (p < 0.01). No difference between interviewers’ views of the 3 station types re difficulty, clear instruct-tions, difficulty for candidate, but slightly lower rating for ability to judge applicant ability on BI(p < 0.05)

8

Gale et al. 2010 [66] Research paper

UK

1 Postgraduate training programme – anaesthetics

Quantitative

Selection Centre – 4 stations:

Structured interview, Portfolio, Presentation, Simulation.

Applicants

N = 178 RR 79% over two years 2007/ 2008

Assessors –N = 24 RR = UTD

Questionnaire -

Mean and standard deviations on 5 point Likert scale (1, poor; 3, satisfactory; 5, excellent)

All four methods were positively rated by applicants & assessors for relevance (3.6–4.7), fairness (3.9–4.4), opportunity to demonstrate ability (3.6–4.2). Both groups rated the simulation station significantly higher for relevance, opportunity to demonstrate ability (P < 0.001)

7

Goulston & Oates 2009 a [47] Report

Australia

1 Medical School

Mixed methods

MMIs, Academic record/ GPA

Aptitude test/ GAMSAT

Extensive consultation with applicants, medical students, Faculty, alumni, Health Services, clinical training, professional bodies & more

N=UTD, RR = UTD

Focus groups, submissions, email surveys, face to face interviews, invited submissions

Medical School report –collating the submissions into 29 recommendations

Stakeholders confirmed a commitment to widening diversity; approved MMIs as the interview tool; recommended including community interviewers; affirmed final selection ranking based on GPA 25%, GAMSAT 25%, MMI 50%

4

Griffin et al. 2008 [67] Research paper

Australia

1 medical school

Medical School

Quantitative

MMIs, Aptitude test/ UMAT

Applicants –

N = 287 RR =84%

Questionnaire survey

Perceptions of the usefulness of coaching, previous interviews experience and practice run on MMI and UMAT performance

Just over half (51.4%) had accessed coaching. Those who had attended coaching rated it more helpful than those who had not (P = 0.001). A MMI practice run was considered most effective way to prepare for MMIs compared with coaching or other interview experience.

8.5

Gula et al. 2014 [68] Abstract

Canada

1 medical school

Quantitative

Standardised interviews

Applicants N=UTD RR = UTD

Interviewers N=UTD RR = UTD

 

Views on atmosphere of interviews, confidence in interviews

Standardised interviews positively received by applicants and interviewers

4.5

Harris & Owen 2007a [69] Research paper

Australia –

1 medical school

Mixed methods

Non-cognitive characteristics

MMIs

Medical students, early graduates, health academics, clinical health workers & administrators N = 105, RR UTD

Also surveyed applicants, post MMI. N=UTD/RR = UTD

Using q method-ology stakeholders ranked non-cognitive characteristics.

No details of survey

Ranking of statements

Applicant feedback simply summarised – no details provided

6 factors emerged & used to develop the MMI: Love of medicine and learning, groundedness, self-confidence, balanced approach, mature social skills and realism.

Applicant feedback overall positive.

7

Henry 2006 a [70] Research paper

USA

1 premedical preparatory programme

Quantitative

Aptitude Test/ MCAT

Academic record/ GPA

N = 97 premedical students

Modified version of Perceived Educational and Career Barriers Inventory

Mean responses to 31 items –Likert-type response scale consisting of strongly disagree (1) - strongly agree (5).

Barriers- Not having a high enough GPA (22% mean 2.38) and MCAT (38% mean 2.94) were seen as the most significant barriers. Letter of recommendation was not seen as high a barrier (78% did not see it as barrier, mean 1.78).

8

Hofmeister et al. 2008a [48] Research paper

Canada

Residency Programme- Family Medicine at 2 Medical Schools

Embedded mixed methods

MMI

Applicants N = 69,RR = 97%

MMI Interviewers N = 31, RR = 94%

Survey with quantitative and qualitative components

Analysis of Likert scale responses (5 point Likert scale 1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) and qualitative data content analysis

Applicants: Preferred MMIs over other interviews (4.6), free from culture (4.6)/gender (4.8) bias. Interviewers: well prepared (4.1) fairness (3.9)/ ability to differentiate (3.6). MMIs helpful assessing professionalism. Needed more time to calibrate.

8.5

Hopson et al. 2014a [71] Research paper

USA

3 Emergency medicine training sites

Quantitative

MMI

Emergency Medicine (EM) interns N = 71 RR =98.6%.

Pre and post experience surveys

Mean Likert responses using five point scale

MMI as part of an interview process would negatively influence their decision to accept offer of interview mean 2.7 pre and 2.8 post MMI. Preference for combined approach of mixed MMI and TI. MMI score did not correlate significantly with preference for MMI. MMI was viewed as an accurate assessment of communication skills (3.3), problem solving skills (3.3)

10

Humphrey et al. 2008a [72] Research paper

UK 1 post graduate deanery

Paediatric training programme

Quantitative

MMI

Applicants N = 72, RR 75%.

Interviewers N = 15, RR 100%.

Questionnaires- Cronbach alpha for applicant and interviewer survey 0.88 &.62 respectively

Means, standard deviations Likert scale responses between 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) and free text comments

Applicants: Fairness 4.3, organised well 5.1, understandable questions 4.8, adequate info 4.4, fairer than traditional interview 4, preferable to traditional interview 3.7, (IMGs preferred MMI significantly more) Wanted more information (n = 8), more time (n = 3). Gender, age or previous MMI experience did not impact opinion.

Interviewers- MMI better than TI 4.8, fair 4.4, needed more stations 4.3, selects best candidates 4, tests appropriate range of competencies 3.6, performance at interview predicts future performance 3.2

9.5

Husbands et al. 2014 a [73] Abstract

UK

Undergraduate

Medical school

Quantitative

SJT

Medical School applicants N = 200 RR = 36.2%

UTD

Applicants perceptions of relevance and validity of SJT summarised – no details

Most applicants (no details) agreed that SJT appeared relevant and valid

3.5

Jauhar et al. 2008a [74] Rsearch paper

Scotland

National survey

Quantitative and open ended comments

Shortlisting / Traditional interviews (TI)

Doctors on Psychiatry training programme N = 123, RR =61.5%

Questionnaire - both open- and closed-ended questions, using a Likert scales

Percentage responses to Likert scale questions

76% lack of confidence in shortlisting process with no significant difference between successful / unsuccessful candidates. 45% thought interviews were invalid. Poor communication & inadequate feedback were problematic. 92% felt references should be available at interviews 63% favour structured references.

8.5

Jayasuriya et al. 2012 a [37] Abstract

UK

1 medical school

Qualitative

Not specified

Medical Students (N=UTD)

Focus groups (N=UTD)

Students perceptions

Students were aware of the components of selection but unsure how they were used. Inconsistency in student advice. Preferred non-academic interviews that used personal statements and communication scenarios

NR

Johnson & Elam 2001a [75] Short research report

USA

1 Medical School

Quantitative

Letters of recommendation (LOR)

Admission committee members N = 14, RR 93%

Premedical advisors N = 42 RR = 87.5%.

Using example letters of recommendation, rated usefulness on 5 point Likert scales from “Not at all” to “Extremely”.

Perceptions of usefulness

There was no difference between the two groups in their perceptions of usefulness and global impression of the sample letters. Both thought most helpful when they factual, descriptive and cited examples of specific behaviours.

8

Kaffenberger et al. 2014a [76] Letter – original research

USA

National Survey

Quantitative

Letters of recommendation (LOR)

Professors of Dermatology - N = 129 RR = 37%

Survey- no details

Percentage responses displayed graphically

LOR from Dermatology Professors and “Physicians I know” considered more reliable than other sources. Perceived problems with LOR are frequently having difficulty in ascertaining the strength of recommendation and reluctance to give honest account of weaknesses

6.5

Kelly et al. 2014 a [77] Research paper

Ireland

1 Undergraduate medical School

Quantitative

MMI (experimental, did not contribute to selection) Aptitude Test / HPAT-Ireland

First Year Medical Students N = 71 RR = 65%

MMI Interviewer N = 24, RR = 49%

Electronic questionnaire survey

Percentage responses

90% students agreed that the MMI content was relevant, 60% felt content of TIs or HPAT-Ireland (38%) were relevant, 73% felt MMI suitable for selection, 79% supported academic record.

75% of interviewers felt that MMI was relevant, reasonably tested candidates’ ability (79%). The majority (71%) thought MMI would be a useful addition to selection

8

Kelly et al. 2014 ba [38] Research paper

Ireland

1 Undergraduate medical School

Qualitative

Aptitude test/ HPAT-Ireland

Qualified doctors from various disciplines (n = 15)

Interviews – analysed using principles of grounded theory

Perceptions of job relevance, acceptability of HPAT-Ireland

Sections 1 and 2 perceived to have good job relatedness, but Section 3 non-verbal reasoning, criticised. Split views on acceptability, with those opposed being principally concerned re possible negative impact on diversity.

NR

Kleshinski et al. 2008a [78] Research paper

USA

1 medical school

Quantitative

Interviews - regarding the value of including professionalism/ethics scenarios in selection interviews

Faculty interviewers N = 91 Applicants N = 107, RR = 54%

Survey

Percentage responses to questionnaire items with five point likert scale responses to statements

Applicants: 74% asking about professionalism positively impacted & 76% agreed it enhanced their view of the medical school. 88% agreed it was important to include in selection interviews. Applicants more positive than interviewers re importance of including professionalism (88% versus 69% p = 0.0001).

7.5

Koczwara et al. 2012 [79] Research paper

UK

Post graduate GP training in one geographical area

Quantitative

Cognitive ability tests clinical problem-solving test (CPST), situational judgement test (SJT)

Applicants N = 249, RR 96%

Validated candidate evaluation questionnaire

Percentage and frequency of responses

Cognitive ability tests: 30% not fair-fair, 35% content not appropriate, 54% not relevant. By contrast figures from the overall 2009 GP applicant pool (n = 2947) showed that the CPST and SJT were regarded as relevant by 89, 63%, appropriate 85, 68% and fair 85 and 53% respectively.

8

Kumar et al. 2009 a [39] Research paper

Australia & Canada

2 Graduate Entry Medical Schools

Qualitative

MMI

MMI Interviewers N = 37, took part in focus groups

MMI Interviewers (n = 75, RR 48%)- completed a survey

Applicants (n = 442; RR = 91%) completed a survey

6 Focus groups and open-ended survey

Framework analysis

Very positively viewed. Candidates valued interviewer independence & multiple opportunities,, but felt time pressured and absence of opportunity to present their motivations. Interviewers less anxious about decision making, but concerns re measuring communication skills and lack of opportunity to bench their marking.

NR

Kumwenda et al. 2013a [80] Research paper

UK

6 Medical schools and 1 dental school

Quantitative

Application including personal statement / UCAS

First year entrants to medical and dental school N = 432 RR = 34%

Online questionnaire

Average and percentage responses

Cronbach alpha 0.77.

66% suspect peers stretch the truth, 16% deceptive practice is common, 84% lying unacceptable, 949% exaggerating on UCAS is dishonest but 14% think part of the admission game (males agree more p < 0.05)

9

Lambe et al. 2012 [81] Research paper

UK

1Medical School

Quantitative

Aptitude Test/ UKCAT

Applicants N = 787, RR = 66%,

Online questionnaire

Percentage responses

86% thought that you can prepare for the UKCAT, 44% felt that advice on the UKCAT was confusing, 55% felt test was fair and 44% agreed it was relevant

6.5

Lievens 2013 [82] Research paper

Belgium

National survey Medical and dental undergraduate

Quantitative- longitudinal multiple cohort study (1999–2002)

SJT & Cognitive tests

Applicants N = UTD, RR 61.8%

Validated questionnaire

Mean, Standard deviation of responses on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).

Mean rating for the face validity of the SJT (3.19 SD 0.88) was significantly higher than cognitive test (2.76 SD 0.68) p < 0.01. SJT viewed as significantly less difficult than cognitive tests.

8.5

Lievens & Sackett 2006 [83] Research paper

Belgium

National survey Medical and dental undergraduate selection

Quantitative

Two formats of SJT video based versus written formats & Cognitive tests

Applicants from two cohorts (N = 638, RR 55%; N = 1078, RR 61%)

Validated questionnaire

Cronbach alpha (0.66, 0.76)

Mean, Standard deviation of responses rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

No significant difference between the mean face validity perceptions of the video SJT (3.41) and written SJT (3.44). Both significantly higher than face validity of the cognitive test (2000 = 2.75, 2003 = 2.79).

10.5

Lubarsky &Young 2013 [84] Abstract

Canada

1 hospital Neurology residency program

Quantitative

MMI

Applicants N = 29 RR = 94%

MMI interviewers no details provided

UTD

UTD

Both applicants and interviewers felt MMIS allowed applicants to showcase their unique attributes and skills, but that the process felt somewhat ‘impersonal’

4

Marrin et al. 2004a [49] Research paper

Canada

1 Medical School

Quantitative

Key qualities of medical selection process, no particular tool identified

Admission stakeholders- N = 277 comprising Faculty, students and community Mean RR across the stakeholder groups 71%

Paired comparison approach-

Z scores for probability of each characteristic being chosen from the pairing

No significant difference between stakeholders. Fairness (mean z score 0.92), Validity (mean z score 0.87), comprehensiveness (0.44), accessibility (0.1), defensible (− 0.3), leads to diversity (− 0.31), affordable (− 0.8), public statement (− 0.9).

8.5

Mathers & Parry 2010a [40] Research paper

UK

3 Medical Schools

Qualitative

Not specified

Older mature students (N = 15)

Unstructured one to one interviews

Framework analysis

Decision to apply made after careful consideration of university location/ access to family support/ identity and fit were key. Inflexibility and uncertainty of process/ UCAS inflexible/ Risks involved in making the application. Financial cost

NR

Milne et al. 2001a [85] Research short report

USA

1 Medical Residency Programme

Quantitative

Interviews

Medical Interns n = 53, RR = 87%.

Questionnaire survey

Percentage responses to categories of five point Likert scale responses from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Interviews viewed as a chance to learn more about programme (84%), sell myself (80%), determine faculty satisfaction with institution (76%) and their own interest in the prog (71). 86% felt interview was necessary, 93% believing no interview was unacceptable.

8

Mitchison 2009a [86] Research paper

UK

1 Post graduate deanery

Quantitative

Selection centre with 3 types of station: structured interview/ case based discussion/ simulated patient

Assessors-N = 53, RR 77%.

Feedback questionnaire

Frequency & percen-tage responses. Note – feedback given per station type, with some assessors responding to more than 1 station

19/21 assessors found the Structured interview useful, 21/24 the communication station, 27/27 case based discussion. 69% felt SC was an improvement on TI, 4% felt it was worse. Positive free text: fairness &objectivity. Negative: inflexibility to explore other issues

7

Monroe et al. 2013a [87] Research paper

USA / Canada

Large scale survey of 142 medical school

Quantitative

Aptitude test / MCAT

Academic record / GPA

Interviews Letter of recommendation

Admission Deans from all US and Canadian medical schools using MCAT N = 120 RR = 85%

Online survey − 69 items - derived from qualitative interviews in 8 medical schools

Means Standard Deviations, frequency of responses. 5 point Likert scale (1 not important – 5 extremely important)

Rating differed depending on the stage of the process- MCAT & GPA viewed most important for shortlisting to interview but less important in the decision of who to admit where interview (mean rating 4.5) & letter of recommendation (3.7) more valued (no p value given), followed by GPA (3.6), community service/volunteering (3.5), MCAT (3.4) and personal statement (3.3)

10

Niyomdecha et al. 2012a [88] Abstract

Thailand

1 medical school

Quantitative

MMIs

Medical students and instructors N=UTD, RR = UTD

UTD

UTD

88% of instructors thought MMI process was good and 100% of students thought MMI was fair

4

O’Brien et al. 2011 [89] Research paper

UK

1 Undergraduate medical School

Quantitative

MMI (experimental, not used for selection) Standardised interviews (SI)

Applicants N = 47,RR = UTD

Interviewers-N=UTD RR = UTD

Questionnaire survey with free text comment boxes

Means, standard deviation, of responses on a 5 point Likert scale scoring

No statistical difference between Interviewers’ ranking of SI and MMI with respect to overall opinion, fairness, accuracy and ability to pick best candidate. School leavers: MMI more accurate, less difficult than SI (p = 0.03 and 0.01). Graduate entrants: MMI more difficult than SI (p = 0.005).

7

O’Flynn et al. 2013 a [90] Research paper

Ireland

National survey

Quantitative

Academic Record – School leaving certificate examination

Aptitude test - HPAT –Ireland

Guidance counsellors N = 187, RR = 15%.

Questionnaire – 26 items and free text comment s

Percentage responses to likert scale answers and simple content analysis of free text comments

52% in favour of the introduction of HPAT-Ireland, 49% felt new system was fair. Those opposed were concerned re negative impact on socially disadvantaged. Majority felt non-verbal reasoning least relevant.

7

Patel et al. 2011a [91] Abstract

USA

Post graduate − 1 medical residency programme

Quantitative

Group Interview

Applicants N = 77 RR = 38%

Online anonymous questionnaire – 15 items

Percentage responses to survey questions

75% liked group interviews, 62% would recommend continued usage. 89% felt group interviews effective. IMGs felt they had much harder time impressing interviewers than local candidates (p = 0.004)

6

Patterson et al. 2009a [92] Research paper

USA

1 medical school with mission to recruit from and serve underserved populations

Quantitative

Aptitude test/MCAT

Academic record / GPA

Applicants - American Indians and Alaskan natives N = 34, RR = 38%, from three chorts.

Included and compared accepted (N = 21) and rejected (N = 13) applicants .

Questionnaire developed from research and pilot – containing numerical and open ended questions

Frequency and percentage responses, chi square and t-test, and groupings of free text comments

Access to supports was limited for both groups but rejected applicants had significantly less support (p < 0.05).MCAT viewed as a barrier by 65% & financing the application by 42% (rejected more so, p < 0.05) Free text comments identified 3 obstacles – finance including cost of MCAT preparation, lack of time to volunteer/ build a CV etc. as working & discouraging/wrong information

8

Patterson et al. 2011 a [7] Research paper

UK

Postgraduate training in General Practice - national survey

Quantitative

SJT

Clinical problem solving test (CPST)

Selection Centre (SC) comprising:

Simulated patient

Group exercise

Written exercise

Applicants to GP training- 3 cohorts 2007–09. N = 9067, RR 56%

Online and paper questionnaire survey.

Mean, Mode Standard deviation of responses Cronbach alpha survey 0.7–.94.

Shortlisting: SJT viewed very job relevant but CPST as more so p < 0.001. Perceptions of fairness (formal test characteristic and interpersonal treatment) were good. Selection centre- All three tasks positively viewed in terms of job relevance, SP more positively p < 0.001. Perceptions of fairness high

9.5

Patterson et al. 2013 [93] Abstract

UK

Large scale survey

Quantitative

SJT

Candidates to Foundation Year Training Programme N=UTD, RR = UTD

UTD

Candidate reaction

Feedback from candidates indicate SJT relevant and fair

3

Randall et al. 2006 [94] Research paper

UK

1postgraduate Paediatric Deanery

Quantitative

Selection centre (SC) comprising group discussion, simulated patient written exercise

Applicants N = 27, RR UTD

Questionnaire survey

Frequency of responses on 5 point Likert scale (1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree)

N = 24agreed that the SC content was appropriate, 24 agreed more relevant than other selection tools & provided better opportunity to demonstrate their skills

6

Razack et al. 2009a [50] Research paper

Canada

1 Undergraduate medical school

Embedded mixed methods

MMI

Applicants -International and non-local. N = 82 RR = 82%.

Unsuccessful applicants N = 50 RR = 60%.

Interviewers N = 38 RR = 100%

Questionnaires with quantitative and qualitative components

Mean ratings and standard deviations of Likert scale responses between 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). Content Analysis of free comments.

Applicants: MMI more fair than SI (p = 0.001) & more effective at evaluating non-academic aptitudes (p = 0.001) more stressful (p = 0.016). Interviewers’ mean scores: Fair 5.2, effective 5.1, appropriate for use with home and international applicants 4.9, transparent 5.2. Concern candidate difference may affect performance, misses some of benefits of TI, some practical issues.

8

Rich 2011 a [95] Abstract

UK

1 medical school- with a widening access agenda

Quantitative

Traditional Interviews (TI)

Medical student admitted via a widening access (WA) route N = UTD RR = UTD

Interviewers n = UTD, RR = UTD

Questionnaire

Satisfaction with TI for widening access in selection

49% students in early clinical years felt TI should be retained. Only 25% of students in clinical years and 20% of interviewers agreed favouring multi station interviewing.

5

Rodgerson et al. 2013 a [96] Abstract

UK

Medical / Dental School

Quantitative with free text

MMI

Traditional Interview

Medical N = 451) and dental applicants (N = 224) RR = 75%

Online survey post

Percentage responses and mean ratings of responses using five point Likert scale

94% agreed MMI suitable for assessing potential 45% agreed TI suitable. MMI more favourable re enjoyment, stressfulness & fairness. 80% gave free text comments relating to fairness, with 40% approving of the opportunity to impress multiple interviewers.

4.5

Samarasekera et al. 2014 [97] Abstract

Singapore

1 medical school

Quantitative

SJT and Focused skills assessment

Applicants and assessors

N=UTD, RR = UTD

UTD

UTD

92% of candidates happy with format. 82% assessors positive perceptions of the process which Evaluated empathy, communication, integrity, general knowledge, resilience, personality profile

5

Stagg & Rosenthal 2012a [41]

Research paper

Australia

1 Medical School

Qualitative

Not specified

Community Members and Members of the rural based Community Liaison N = 12

Semi structured individual interviews

Thematic analysis

Overwhelmingly saw involvement in selection of students as positive. Opportunity for professional &personal growth; responsibility to represent the broader community; protecting the student and public interest and self-interest in shaping the future workforce.

NR

Stevens et al. 2013a [51] Research paper

Ireland

3 medical schools

Mixed methods – embedded

Aptitude Test/ HPAT –Ireland

First Year medical students N = 291, RR = 77%,

Questionnaire survey

Percentage responses and simple content analysis of free text

Almost all support academic record as suitable tool, 78% interviews, 74% personality tests, 68% adjunct admission tests. International students more likely to support interviews, knowledge about course, references and personal statements (all p < 0.01), Of those who had sat HPAT (N = 175) – 76% felt it fair, 37% felt it was easier for males, 32% felt non-verbal reasoning section irrelevant . 54% had accessed prep course, of these 79% felt it improved performance

8

Tiller et al. 2013 [98] Research paper

Australia Graduate entry medical & dental school

Quantitative

Internet based MMI (iMMI)

Applicants N = 119 RR = 41%

Interviewers N = 78, RR = UTD

Online survey

Percentage responses and mean ratings to responses using five point Likert scale(5 = very satisfied, 1-very unsatisfied)

Mean satisfaction ratings with use of skype technology 4.25, overall interviews process 4.2, being interviewed online as part of overall selection process 4.10, video quality 4.09, audio quality 4.08. 68% would prefer an in-person MMI and 32% a skype interviews. 78% of Interviewers satisfied with the iMMI, 71% with the technology. Free text comments re concerns re operational & technical issues

8

Turner & Nicholson 2011a [42] Research paper

UK

1 Undergraduate Medical School

Qualitative

Written application / UCAS

Personal Statement/ Letter of reference

Medical school selectors –in three focus groups- clinical / non-clinical and lay members N = 17

Focus groups and document review

Thematic framework analysis and triangulation with recorded reasons

Four themes: Work experience/ commitment to study medicine/ teacher reference/ personal statement. Most common reason for rejection was poor medically related work experience. Teacher reference viewed as influential esp. for rejection but hard to interpret. Personal statement – useful but considered highly subjective. Ideal candidate extremely difficult to judge

NR

Uijtdehaage et al. 2011 [99] Research paper

USA

1 medical School

Specialised to develop leadership & serve disadvantage

Quantitative

MMI

Applicants

Cohort 1: N = 76, RR =100%

Cohort 2: N = 77, RR =99%

Interviewers N = 26 RR = 93%

Questionnaire surveys – 8-10 items

Mean ratings and standard deviations of Likert scale responses between 1 (definitely not) to 7 (definitely).

Cohort results presented separately

Applicants: able to present abilities (5.6, 5.7), adequate instructions (6.2, 6.5), sufficient time (3.7, 4), free from gender (6.6–6.7) or cultural bias (6.3, 6.6), stressful (4.2, 3.7) . Interviewers – accurate portrayal (5.6), prepared (6), clear instructions (6.2), adequate time (4.7), allow differentiation (5.7), Overall fair (6.2)

9

UKCAT Consortium 2009/2010 [100] Report

National Survey

UK Medical Schools using UKCAT

Quantitative

UKCAT / Aptitude

Applicants N = 6821, RR =27%

Questionnaire

Percentage responses and majority opinions

Considered a difficult test. Unconvinced it tests right attributes. 40% felt their college or school were not well informed about UKCAT/ ¾ had used online practice materials/ books, and found them useful. 90% happy with testing environment.

6

UKCAT Consortium 2011 [101] Report

National Survey

UK Medical Schools using UKCAT

Quantitative

UKCAT / Aptitude

Applicants RR = 19.5%

Questionnaire

Percentage responses and majority opinions

44% found out it from websites /prospectuses. 33% found out from their schools. 36% of candidates from independent schools rated their advice as good or very good, only 18% from comprehensive schools agreed with this. Majority very supportive of practice tests (93%) and books (90%). Timing in the test is crucial.

6

Vermeulen et al. 2012 [102] Abstract

Post Graduate GP training. Nether-lands

Quantitative

Behaviour specific interviews, knowledge test, SJT and simulated consultation versus traditional interviews (T)

Applicants N = 47 RR = UTD

UTD

UTD

Both TI & behaviour specific interviews were considered job relevant & fair/ but latter offered better opportunity to show competencies. Both SJT and knowledge based test were considered job relevant. SJT considered fair (95.7%), simulated consultation (78%) knowledge based test (64%).

4.5

Waheed et al. 2011a [103] Research paper

Pakistan

1 medical school

Quantitative

Interviews that include a scenario based on professionalism as part of the interview

Medical Students N = 100

Faculty members N = 100

Students and faculty attended a lecture about profesion-alism scenarios that could be included in interviews and then discussed these and completed a survey

Frequency of responses

77% of students highly positively influenced by the lecture compared to 10% faculty, 85% students / 76% Faculty agreed it influenced their impression of Medical school values Faculty more likely to feel important to include such scenarios in admission interviews (p = 0.01)

7

Westwood et al. 2007a [104] Research paper

UK

1 Post graduate Deanery Cardiology

Quantitative

Structured Interviews

Applicants N = 94, RR = 80%.

Questionnaire

Median and interquartile range of Likert scale responses between 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree)

Satisfaction rating high, (2), objective (2), appropriate duration (2) offered sufficient scope to express individuality (2) and was relevant to the job (2).

7

White et al. 2011a [43]

Research paper

Canada

1 Medical School

Qualitative

Essay

Applicants - N = 20

Review of 240 randomly selected essays and interviews. Qualit-ative analysis using modified grounded theory

How applicants approach writing the essay

Applicants expressed the idea that they had approached the essays as a way to “show themselves” and “tell their own story” in a subjective way which they felt was missing from other parts of the admission process.

NR

Wilkinson & Wilkinson 2013 [105]

Research paper

New Zealand

1 Medical School

Quantitative

Aptitude Test/ UMAT

Medical Students –

two cohorts 2010/2011 N = 263 RR = UTD

Online survey of self -reported- forms of preparation used for UMAT and received confidence

Percentage response rates, comparisons of scores mean and standard deviation

Commonest forms of preparation were ACER practice materials, MED Entry course, and student led tutorials. Students who took a MED Entry course had significantly higher confidence (mean diff Likert score 0.6), No significate differences for those taking student led tutorials. Moderately strong positive correlation between amount of money spent and confidence r = 0.3, p < 0.001.

10.5

Wright 2012 [44] PhD Thesis

UK

1 Medical School

Mixed Methods thesis, with Qualitative strand used to explore stakeholder views

UK Medical School Admission processes- personal statements, interviews

Medical Students (n = 13)

Interviews - Qualitative analysis using Framework analysis

Students’ views of influences on decision to apply to medical school and preparedness

Family & School were highly influential on decision, support for application activities such as work experience, preparing personal statements and interviews practice. Students from medical /professional backgrounds and fee paying schools were better supported/prepared.

NR

Ziv et al. 2008 [106] Research paper

Israel

1 Medical School

Quantitative

Selection centre/ known as MOR

Applicants (two cohorts) N = 510 RR = 90.6% -

MOR Raters – largely Senior Faculty members n = 352 RR = UTD

Questionnaire

Frequency of responses with four point Likert scale

76% of applicants rated MOR as fair 76% felt they had opportunity to express their capabilities 85% (n = 299) of rater found it fair. 92% rated MOR assessment items as appropriate

7

  1. Key: NR - not relevant because qualitative study, UTD –unable to determine as insufficient information provided
  2. a Studies where establishing stakeholder view was principal aim