Validity evidence for the Hamburg multiple mini-interview

BMC Medical Education

Table 3 Descriptive statistics and reliability values for study measures

	N	M	SD	Min / Max	Skewness	Shapiro-Wilk Test	Reliability
MMI	196	3.63	.47	2.38 / 4.69	−.35	W = 0.99, p < .05	Overall = .65^a: ICC = .68
Study 1:
Global Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEIQue-SF)	247	5.38	.62	3.57 / 6.63	−.51	W = 0.98, p < .001	α = .86
Emotion Management (STEM)	247	1.11	.23	.71 / 2.38	1.59	W = 0.90, p < .001	α = .94
Study 2:
GP psychosocial competencies	195	4.53	.72	1.00 / 5.00	−2.46	W = 0.68, p < .01	α = .94^b: ICC = .88 / .92^b
GP suitability	193	3.71	.54	1.00 / 4.00	−2.20	W = 0.60, p < .01	ICC = .73 / .61^c
Study 3:
OSCE	301	199.65	10.17	164 / 221	−1.13	W = 0.93, p < .001	α = .53^d

N = number of students, M = mean, SD = standard deviation, Min / Max = minimum and maximum value, α = Cronbach’s Alpha, ICC = intraclass correlation for interrater reliability
MMI = multiple mini-interview, TEIQue-SF = Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire Short Form, STEM = Situational Test of Emotion Management, GP = general practitioner, OSCE = objective structured clinical examination
^aOverall reliability was estimated by means of a mixed-model. See Hissbach, et al. [15] for more details on the formula
^bAlpha refers to the internal consistency of five items. ICCs refer to the interrater-agreement for the average measure of the five items in cases of two raters (first value, n = 53) and in cases of three raters per subject (second value, n = 74)
^cInterrater-agreement for one item in cases of two raters (first value, n = 51) and in cases of three raters per subject (second value, n = 74)
^cAlpha refers to the internal consistency of twelve station scores

ISSN: 1472-6920