Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Positive predictive value of medical student specialty choices

  • M. Douglas JonesJr1Email author,
  • Traci Yamashita2,
  • Randal G. Ross^3 and
  • Jennifer Gong4
^Deceased
BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:33

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1138-x

Received: 29 May 2017

Accepted: 2 March 2018

Published: 9 March 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Umoren
6 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Carr
26 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Amalba
24 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Doug Jones
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Doug Jones
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
2 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12909-018-1138-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
(2)
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
(3)
Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
(4)
Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA

Advertisement