This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Positive predictive value of medical student specialty choices
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 29 May 2017
Accepted: 2 March 2018
Published: 9 March 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Umoren|
|6 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Carr|
|26 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Amalba|
|24 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Doug Jones|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Doug Jones|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Mar 2018||Editorially accepted|
|9 Mar 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12909-018-1138-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.