Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A searchable database of medical education objectives – creating a comparable gold standard

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Komenda
10 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Inga Hege
13 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sage Arbor
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Inga Hege
18 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sami Shaban
5 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sam Brooks
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sam Brooks
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
2 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12909-018-1136-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement