A searchable database of medical education objectives – creating a comparable gold standard
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Komenda|
|10 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Inga Hege|
|13 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sage Arbor|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Inga Hege|
|18 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sami Shaban|
|5 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Sam Brooks|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Sam Brooks|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|2 Mar 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12909-018-1136-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.