Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effects of a work-based critical reflection program for novice nurses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Boštjan Žvanut
4 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Debra Creedy
5 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Lindell
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yeon Hee Kim
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Lindell
10 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Boštjan Žvanut
19 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yeon Hee Kim
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Lindell
15 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Boštjan Žvanut
18 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yeon Hee Kim
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
27 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12909-018-1135-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement