This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Why nutrition education is inadequate in the medical curriculum: a qualitative study of students’ perspectives on barriers and strategies
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 11 February 2017
Accepted: 24 January 2018
Published: 12 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leslie Cunningham-Sabo|
|2 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fernando Vio|
|4 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Victor Mogre|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|12 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12909-018-1130-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.