Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How the study of online collaborative learning can guide teachers and predict students’ performance in a medical course

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sandars
25 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert A. Hanneman
30 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingo Kollar
27 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mohammed Saqr
Resubmission - Version 2
27 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert A. Hanneman
10 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sandars
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingo Kollar
20 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mohammed Saqr
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert A. Hanneman
20 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingo Kollar
11 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mohammed Saqr
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12909-018-1126-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement