This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Training programmes to improve evidence uptake and utilisation by physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 8 August 2017
Accepted: 9 January 2018
Published: 15 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristin Lo|
|23 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Norman|
|24 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Penney Upton|
|22 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jessica Stander|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Jessica Stander|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|15 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12909-018-1121-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.