This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ethnic bias and clinical decision-making among New Zealand medical students: an observational study
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 11 November 2016
Accepted: 8 January 2018
Published: 23 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager|
|7 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Jeffrey Schwartz|
|5 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ricci Harris|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Jeffrey Schwartz|
|24 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager|
|14 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ricci Harris|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12909-018-1120-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.