Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Voluntary vs. compulsory student evaluation of clerkships: effect on validity and potential bias

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Hopson
1 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Krupat
26 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sola Aoun Bahous
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Krupat
8 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Hopson
30 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sola Aoun Bahous
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sola Aoun Bahous
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sola Aoun Bahous
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1116-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement