Dental hygienists’ perceptions of professionalism are multidimensional and context-dependent: a qualitative study in Japan
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - JoAnn R. Gurenlian|
|26 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pia Andersson|
|26 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kimberly Coulton|
|3 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yukiko Nagatani|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pia Andersson|
|4 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kimberly Coulton|
|13 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yukiko Nagatani|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1107-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.