Skip to main content

Table 3 Participant responses to questionnaire regarding utility, interpersonal dynamics, equity, hierarchy and validity of feedback (nā€‰=ā€‰20)

From: Peer feedback for examiner quality assurance on MRCGP International South Asia: a mixed methods study

Ā 

Yes, n (%)

No, n (%)

Would you prefer a remote form of observation to direct observation? eg. By video recording candidate and examiner performance

13 (65)

7 (35)

Has your acceptance of feedback varied depending on who is giving you feedback? Eg. Senior member of the team/junior member of the team

11 (55)

9 (45)

Has your acceptance of feedback varied depending on the way it was delivered?

11 (55)

9 (45)

Has your level of comfort with the peer feedback process improved with increased number of times you experienced review?

20 (100)

ā€“

Do you find you have adequate opportunity for discussion with your reviewer?

7 (35)

13 (65)

Did the reviewersā€™ comments/presence help you in your marking in any way?

16 (80)

4 (20)

Would you like to have a written copy of the reviewersā€™ feedback?

18 (90)

2 (10)

Would you like more detailed feedback?

13 (65)

7 (35)