This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Peer feedback for examiner quality assurance on MRCGP International South Asia: a mixed methods study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 November 2016
Accepted: 4 December 2017
Published: 8 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Godfrey Pell|
|27 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanna Tai|
|9 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dinusha Priyadharshani Perera|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanna Tai|
|21 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dinusha Priyadharshani Perera|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1090-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.