Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What will it take? Pathways, time and funding: Australian medical students’ perspective on clinician-scientist training

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Griffin
27 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pavel V Ovseiko
30 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Fan
4 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert H Tai
24 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Diann Eley
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pavel V Ovseiko
8 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Griffin
17 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Diann Eley
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Diann Eley
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1081-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement