Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Milestones-based direct observation tools in internal medicine resident continuity clinic

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danette Mckinley
19 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Möltner
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Berz
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danette Mckinley
8 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Möltner
13 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Berz
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Berz
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Berz
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1077-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement