This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Fostering clinical reasoning in physiotherapy: comparing the effects of concept map study and concept map completion after example study in novice and advanced learners
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 May 2016
Accepted: 16 November 2017
Published: 1 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clare Delany|
|21 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Doody|
|28 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Katherine Montpetit-Tourangeau|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Doody|
|19 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clare Delany|
|26 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Katherine Montpetit-Tourangeau|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clare Delany|
|27 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Doody|
|29 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Katherine Montpetit-Tourangeau|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|1 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1076-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.