Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Valued experiences of graduate students in their role as educators in undergraduate training in Ugandan medical schools

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Godfrey Rukundo
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Godfrey Rukundo
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Donkers
6 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ray Fewtrell
21 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Godfrey Rukundo
Resubmission - Version 4
21 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Godfrey Rukundo
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
25 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1073-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement