Table 2 Estimation results of the validity of the HAM-Nat by four different methods
From: Correcting the predictive validity of a selection test for the effect of indirect range restriction
Correction Method | Validity of HAM-Nat (\( {\widehat{r}}_{y{x}_1\mid a} \)) |
|---|---|
Thorndike’s case A | .56 |
Thorndike’s case C | .59 |
Expectation maximization (EM) | .60 |
Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) | .59 |