This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Medical student INtervention to promote effective nicotine dependence and tobacco HEalthcare (MIND-THE-GAP): single-centre feasibility randomised trial results
- Anusha Kumar†1,
- Kenneth D. Ward2,
- Lisa Mellon3,
- Miriam Gunning4,
- Sinead Stynes4,
- Anne Hickey3,
- Ronán Conroy5,
- Shane MacSweeney3,
- David Horan1,
- Graduate Entry Programme 2014-18 Class1,
- Liam Cormican6,
- Seamus Sreenan7 and
- Frank Doyle†3Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 March 2017
Accepted: 12 November 2017
Published: 11 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolf Langewitz|
|7 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yayi Prabandari|
|3 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anusha Kumar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anusha Kumar|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1069-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.