Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Online or face-to-face instruction? A qualitative study on the electrocardiogram course at the University of Ulm to examine why students choose a particular format

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Heim
8 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Kalmey
9 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Peterzan
9 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Kalmey
22 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Peterzan
23 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Heim
7 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 4
4 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Keis
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1053-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement