This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessment of motivational interviewing: a qualitative study of response process validity, content validity and feasibility of the motivational interviewing target scheme (MITS) in general practice
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 November 2016
Accepted: 2 November 2017
Published: 21 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Ruiz Moral|
|31 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Birgitte Nørgaard|
|7 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Riëtta Oberink|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Riëtta Oberink|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1052-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.