This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of formula and number-right scoring in undergraduate medical training: a Rasch model analysis
- Dario Cecilio-Fernandes†1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Harro Medema†2,
- Carlos Fernando Collares3,
- Lambert Schuwirth3, 4,
- Janke Cohen-Schotanus1 and
- René A. Tio1
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 January 2017
Accepted: 2 November 2017
Published: 9 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah O'Mara|
|15 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dario Cecilio Fernandes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dario Cecilio Fernandes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|9 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1051-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.