Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Education

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

First and second year medical students identify and self-stereotype more as doctors than as students: a questionnaire study

BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:209

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1049-2

Received: 28 February 2017

Accepted: 2 November 2017

Published: 13 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Depin Cao
5 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathryn Andolsek
6 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bryan Burford
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bryan Burford
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
2 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1049-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Medical Education, Newcastle University
(2)
Department of Psychology, Durham University

Advertisement