This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Contextual factors and clinical reasoning: differences in diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning in board certified versus resident physicians
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 December 2016
Accepted: 2 November 2017
Published: 15 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Inga Hege|
|11 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzette Cooke|
|4 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Elexis McBee|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Inga Hege|
|21 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzette Cooke|
|23 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah O'Mara|
|25 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Elexis McBee|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Elexis McBee|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1041-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.