Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Contextual factors and clinical reasoning: differences in diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning in board certified versus resident physicians

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Inga Hege
11 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzette Cooke
4 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Elexis McBee
Resubmission - Version 2
4 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Inga Hege
21 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzette Cooke
23 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah O'Mara
25 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Elexis McBee
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Elexis McBee
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1041-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement