Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression analysis for predicting PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores

From: Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students

  beta t p R2 F df1 df2 p
PHQ
     .22 20.32 4 275 .000
   MP .35 5.88 .000      
   Agreeableness −.13 −2.43 .016      
   PC .13 2.19 0.30      
   O −.11 −2.13 .034      
GAD-7
     .20 35.76 2 278 .000
   MP .34 5.80 .000      
   Neuroticism .19 3.29 .001      
  1. Notes: MP maladaptive perfectionism, PC parental criticism, O organization, df degrees of freedom. For the stepwise regression analysis the following variables were used: Sex, age, GPA, GSE, SOP, OOP, SPP, Personal Standards, Concern over mistakes, Parental Expectations, Parental Criticism, Doubts about Action, Organization, Adaptive Perfectionism, Maladaptive Perfectionism, Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were used. Variables with a significance level of .05 were included while variables with a significance level of at least .10 were excluded