Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression analysis for predicting PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores

From: Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students

 

beta

t

p

R2

F

df1

df2

p

PHQ

    

.22

20.32

4

275

.000

   MP

.35

5.88

.000

     

   Agreeableness

−.13

−2.43

.016

     

   PC

.13

2.19

0.30

     

   O

−.11

−2.13

.034

     

GAD-7

    

.20

35.76

2

278

.000

   MP

.34

5.80

.000

     

   Neuroticism

.19

3.29

.001

     
  1. Notes: MP maladaptive perfectionism, PC parental criticism, O organization, df degrees of freedom. For the stepwise regression analysis the following variables were used: Sex, age, GPA, GSE, SOP, OOP, SPP, Personal Standards, Concern over mistakes, Parental Expectations, Parental Criticism, Doubts about Action, Organization, Adaptive Perfectionism, Maladaptive Perfectionism, Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were used. Variables with a significance level of .05 were included while variables with a significance level of at least .10 were excluded