Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Griffin
9 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Wilson
15 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy J Wood
5 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Jerant
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy J Wood
1 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Griffin
26 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Jerant
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Jerant
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1030-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement