This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 March 2017
Accepted: 31 October 2017
Published: 6 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Griffin|
|9 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Wilson|
|15 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy J Wood|
|5 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anthony Jerant|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy J Wood|
|1 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Griffin|
|26 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anthony Jerant|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anthony Jerant|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1030-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.