Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Self-reported needs for improving the supervision competence of PhD supervisors from the medical sciences in Denmark

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chunfang de Zhou
5 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - GINA WISKER
13 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rie Raffing
Resubmission - Version 2
13 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - GINA WISKER
11 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rie Raffing
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rie Raffing
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1023-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement