This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Repeated testing improves achievement in a blended learning approach for risk competence training of medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 June 2016
Accepted: 19 September 2017
Published: 26 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt Sibbald|
|24 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janine Margarita Dizon|
|30 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Cord Spreckelsen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt Sibbald|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie K. Tilson|
|25 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Cord Spreckelsen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1016-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.