This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Do virtual patients prepare medical students for the real world? Development and application of a framework to compare a virtual patient collection with population data
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 March 2017
Accepted: 14 September 2017
Published: 22 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jaroslav Majerník|
|26 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Margaret Bearman|
|31 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Marcel Urresti-Gundlach|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jaroslav Majerník|
|15 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Margaret Bearman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-1013-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.