Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Virtual patients in the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills: does presentation mode matter? A quasi-randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Wilson
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sven Anders
25 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nikolai Schuelper
10 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Valerie Dory
13 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fabian Schubach
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sven Anders
17 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Valerie Dory
30 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fabian Schubach
Resubmission - Version 3
30 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fabian Schubach
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1004-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement