Skip to main content

Table 5 Pairwise comparison of students’ performance in assessments

From: Short-duration podcasts as a supplementary learning tool: perceptions of medical students and impact on assessment performance

Groups

N

Paired differences

Significance (2-tailed)

Mean

SEM

99% Confidence interval

Lower

Upper

T3MTL - TP

 Overall

94

1.67

0.43

0.53

2.8

<0.001

 3MTL: Heavy-users

41

2.32

0.74

0.32

4.31

0.003

 3MTL: Intermediate-users

34

1.07

0.67

−0.75

2.9

0.117

 3MTL: Non-users

19

1.33

0.76

−0.86

3.52

0.098

T3MTL - TS

 Overall

92

3.3

0.43

2.19

4.47

<0.001

 3MTL: Heavy-users

41

4.20

0.66

2.43

5.97

<0.001

 3MTL: Intermediate-users

32

2.63

0.73

0.62

4.64

0.001

 3MTL: Non-users

19

2.63

0.91

0.003

5.26

0.01

Analysis of subgroups of 3MTL: Heavy-users

T3MTL - TP

 Below-average performers

13

2.94

1.74

−0.84

6.73

0.116

 Average performers

14

2.57

1.38

−0.41

5.55

0.085

 Above-average performers

14

1.48

0.58

0.24

2.73

0.023

T3MTL - TS

 Below-average performers

13

6.40

1.07

4.06

8.75

<0.001

 Average performers

14

4.66

1.33

1.78

7.54

0.004

 Above-average performers

14

1.70

0.51

0.59

2.80

0.005

  1. Paired differences of scores in the test (Test3MTL) which had implemented 3MTLs were compared with assessments that immediately preceded (TestP) and succeeded (TestS). Based on self-reported 3MTL usage, students were divided into 3 groups for comparison [3MTL: Heavy-users (used 3MTLs for two topics); 3MTL: Intermediate-users (used 3MTLs for some of the topics); 3MTL: Non-users (did not use 3MTLs]. For intragroup comparison, students were classified into tertiles based on their average scores in the historic assessments conducted prior to TestP (Below-average performers, Average performers, and Above-average performers). All tests were scored out of a maximum of 30. SEM: Standard Error of Mean. Paired t-test was used for all comparisons. Significant p values are highlighted in bold