Skip to content


BMC Medical Education

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Facilitators of high-quality teaching in medical school: findings from a nation-wide survey among clinical teachers

BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:178

Received: 12 May 2017

Accepted: 5 September 2017

Published: 29 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
12 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Wilson
2 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vivian Isaac
15 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hubertus JERSMANN
2 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Schiekirka-Schwake
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-1000-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Medical Education Research and Curriculum Development, Study Deanery of Göttingen Medical School
Department of Legal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf
Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Centre Göttingen
Department of Medical Education, Medical Faculty, University of Münster
Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen