Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Education

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Hotspots in research on the measurement of medical students’ clinical competence from 2012-2016 based on co-word analysis

BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:162

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0999-8

Received: 13 April 2017

Accepted: 5 September 2017

Published: 12 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kimberly Coulton
14 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John F Sarwark
17 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xing Chang
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
5 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
12 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0999-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Education, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
(2)
Product Management Department, China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation
(3)
Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Advertisement