This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Toward a better judgment of item relevance in progress testing
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 January 2017
Accepted: 27 August 2017
Published: 5 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Spencer Harpe|
|26 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gary Velan|
|20 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Xandra Janssen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Xandra Janssen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0989-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.