Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Education

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Toward a better judgment of item relevance in progress testing

BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:151

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0989-x

Received: 27 January 2017

Accepted: 27 August 2017

Published: 5 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Spencer Harpe
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary Velan
20 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xandra Janssen
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xandra Janssen
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0989-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Health, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
(2)
Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University

Advertisement