Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Observable phenomena that reveal medical students' clinical reasoning ability during expert assessment of their history taking: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Catharina Haring
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Loftus
15 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Chacko
15 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Salman Guraya
16 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Sergio Da Silva
4 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catharina Haring
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Salman Guraya
17 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Chacko
17 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Loftus
25 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catharina Haring
Resubmission - Version 4
25 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Salman Guraya
6 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Loftus
8 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Chacko
2 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catharina Haring
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0983-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement