This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Longitudinal predictive validity of emotional intelligence on first year medical students perceived stress
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 September 2016
Accepted: 14 August 2017
Published: 18 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Fletcher|
|5 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - María José Osé Chambel|
|5 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Richa Gupta|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - María José Osé Chambel|
|23 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Richa Gupta|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|18 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0979-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.