This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Coming back from the edge: a qualitative study of a professional support unit for junior doctors
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 February 2017
Accepted: 13 August 2017
Published: 23 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Elaine Wainwright|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michele Daly|
|16 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonia Rich|
|6 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Elaine Wainwright|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0978-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.