Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive analyses and factor solution for the modified Likert items with three categories

From: Evaluation of large-group lectures in medicine – development of the SETMED-L (Student Evaluation of Teaching in MEDical Lectures) questionnaire

 

Study 1 (n = 922)

Study 2 (n = 2740)

Factor solution

Item

Mean (SD)

Median

Skew

Kurtosis

# imputed

Ceiling %

Floor %

Mean (SD)

Median

Skew

Kurtosis

# imputed

Ceiling %

Floor %

Cronbach’s alpha (if item removed)

Factor loadings

Factor 1: core teaching skills

              

0,892

 

 1) Session is well structured.

4,4 (0,81)

5

−1,3

1,44

7

55,1

0,4

4,3 (0,82)

4

-1,15

1,09

28

49,6

0,5

0,881

−0,493

 2) Provided learning materials enhance understanding.

4,4 (0,79)

5

−1,45

2,23

8

56

0,7

4,3 (0,84)

4

−1,26

1,49

49

50

0,8

0,879

−0,619

 3) Congruence between learning objectives and actual content.

4,3 (0,95)

5

−1,47

2,07

63

50,6

2,5

4,3 (0,87)

5

−1,54

2,66

128

51,3

1,8

0,884

−0,681

 4) Teacher behaves respectfully towards students.

4,7 (0,59)

5

−2,88

10,76

18

79

0,6

4,8 (0,5)

5

−3

11,78

25

82,7

0,2

0,886

−0,855

 5) Teacher comments students’ contributions and answers questions.

4,6 (0,74)

5

−2,04

4,99

49

67,7

0,9

4,6 (0,7)

5

−2,17

5,64

119

69,9

0,7

0,882

−0,698

 6) Goal communication

3,8 (1,35)

4

−0,87

−0,49

53

43,2

10,4

4,2 (1,1)

5

−1,3

0,89

138

51,8

3,9

0,897

−0,689

 7) Teacher enhances students’ interest in subject matter

3,9 (1,08)

4

−0,73

−0,33

131

38,1

2,2

3,8 (1,03)

4

−0,64

−0,25

42

31,6

2,2

0,877

−0,557

 8) Teacher elucidates logical connections

4,3 (0,85)

4

−1,26

1,66

15

49,2

1,1

4,2 (0,85)

4

−0,93

0,52

48

41,6

0,4

0,875

−0,694

 9) Use of examples relevant for practice

4,3 (0,92)

5

−1,36

1,36

20

56

1,2

4,2 (0,94)

4

−1,18

0,85

57

49,7

1,2

0,876

−0,798

 10) Teacher expresses him−/herself clearly

4,5 (0,76)

5

−1,92

3,92

21

67,3

0,6

4,5 (0,77)

5

−1,8

3,64

51

62,5

0,8

0,879

−0,818

Factor 2: student activation skills

              

0,807

 

 11) Adequate balance between didactic teaching and student participation

3,7 (1,16)

4

−0,57

−0,55

13

30,7

4,8

3,6 (1,21)

4

−0,38

−0,88

62

28

5,3

NAa

0,677

 12) Teacher asks questions to check student learning outcome

3,6 (1,24)

4

−0,53

−0,8

31

32,2

6,3

3,2 (1,27)

3

−0,11

−1,03

109

19,7

10,6

NAa

0,934

Factor 3: student workload

              

0,872

 

 13) Teaching pitched to the student level

4,4 (0,72)

5

−1,26

1,57

9

56

0,2

4,3 (0,76)

4

−1,14

1,4

21

48,3

0,3

NAa

0,916

 14) Amount of content covered is appropriate

4,3 (0,82)

5

−1,24

1,34

6

52,4

0,6

4,2 (0,93)

4

−1,15

1,09

26

43,2

1,6

NAa

0,946

  1. Oblimin rotation (only factor loadings ≥0.4 are reported). Original item wordings (German) and English translations can be found in the Additional file 1of this article
  2. a NA not available. For two item factors, Cronbach’s alpha if item removed could not be computed