- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Just fun or a prejudice? – physician stereotypes in common jokes and their attribution to medical specialties by undergraduate medical students
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 December 2016
Accepted: 13 July 2017
Published: 26 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark David Schwartz|
|21 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ludmila Marcinowicz|
|28 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kelly Mulvey|
|29 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Martin Pyra|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Martin Pyra|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0964-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.