Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “No patient should die of PPH just for the lack of training!” Experiences from multi-professional simulation training on postpartum hemorrhage in northern Tanzania: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Signe Egenberg
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Signe Egenberg
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanna Tai
27 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bergh
27 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Signe Egenberg
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanna Tai
24 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bergh
16 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Signe Egenberg
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Signe Egenberg
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
27 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0957-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement