This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Impact of a narrative medicine programme on healthcare providers’ empathy scores over time
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 September 2016
Accepted: 26 June 2017
Published: 5 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valentin Terhoeven|
|5 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iris Schleicher|
|3 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Po-Jui Chen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Po-Jui Chen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Po-Jui Chen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0952-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.