This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effectiveness of distance learning strategies for continuing professional development (CPD) for rural allied health practitioners: a systematic review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 November 2016
Accepted: 26 June 2017
Published: 12 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne Elizabeth Topping|
|5 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Humayun J. Chaudhry|
|2 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Angela Berndt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Angela Berndt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0949-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.