This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing colonoscopic inspection skill using a virtual withdrawal simulation: a preliminary validation of performance metrics
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 October 2016
Accepted: 26 June 2017
Published: 12 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marina Sawdon|
|28 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernard Cerutti|
|1 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne Topping|
|2 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Christine Zupanc|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Christine Zupanc|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0948-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.